Visitors Counter

mod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_countermod_vvisit_counter
mod_vvisit_counterToday186
mod_vvisit_counterYesterday579

Random Quotes

What's done to children, they will do to society. ~Karl Menninger

Polls

Do you think the rules/laws are applied to Fathers more stringently as compared to Mothers?
 

Resources & Useful links

Bookmarks

 
 

Bookmark us With


RedditDel.icio.usGet more widgets at VivoCiti.comDiggGoogleHuggReddot@eShiok!LiveFacebookSlashdotNetscapeTechnoratiStumbleUponSpurlWistsSimpyNewsvineBlinklistFurlFarkBlogmarksYahooSmarkingNetvouzShadowsRawSugarMa.gnoliaPlugIMSquidooco.mmentsBlogMemesFeedMeLinksBlinkBitsTailranklinkaGoGo
Module is designed by http://www.vivociti.com

Certificate of Appreciation

Click to see PDF

Our Friends

SIFF
Mynation Foundation
manushi
CRISP-Petition


YouCMSAndBlog Module Generator Wizard Plugin

AllVideos Reloaded

Custody cases need human touch, rules SC PDF Print E-mail
(0 Votes)
Written by Express news service   
New Delhi: Hearing a child custody case recently, the Supreme Court held that these cases could not be decided “solely” by interpreting legal provisions. It even laid out that while dealing with such cases a court “is neither bound by statutes nor by strict rules of evidence or procedure nor by precedents”.

“It is a humane problem and is required to be solved with human touch,” observed a Bench headed by Justice C K Thakker.

The Bench, which also comprised Justice D K Jain, noted that in selecting a guardian, the court exercises parens patriae and is expected, and indeed bound to give due weight to a child’s comfort, contentment, health, education, intellectual development and favourable surroundings.

The Bench even asked courts to consider “moral and ethical values” which, it felt, “cannot be ignored” while deciding as to who should get the custody rights. According to the apex court, “they are equally, even more important, essential and indispensable considerations”.

The court made these observations while dealing with a petition filed by Nil Ratan Kundu and his wife, who opposed the granting of custody of their six-year-old grandson to be their son-in-law. They urged the court to take into account the “preference” of the child as well. “Normally, in custody cases, wishes of the minor child should be ascertained by the court before deciding as to whom custody should be given,” the court said while declining the father’s plea that he was the natural guardian.

 



Related Articles:

Powered By relatedArticle

YouCMSAndBlog Module Generator Wizard Plugin